The number of whistleblowers receiving awards from the SEC dropped sharply in fiscal year 2023, even as more tips poured in than ever before, and a single informant received the largest payout in agency history.
The agency received more than 18,000 tips in the fiscal year ending Sept. 30, a 50% jump from the previous year, according to the Securities and Exchange Commission whistleblower program's annual report to Congress. But only 68 tipsters received any money, far down from the more than 100 in each of the previous two years.
Interviews with attorneys who participate in the program and a review of SEC decisions — along with court cases challenging some of those decisions — portray a program straining under the weight of its success. The lure of huge payouts, such as the $279 million that went to one tipster last year amid no growth in the program's staffing or budget, may be taxing the SEC's ability to keep up with the intent of the legislation authorizing it, attorneys say.
"They need more resources. The SEC is very good at evaluating whistleblower disclosures and prioritizing action, but surely when you have 18,000 tips, there's a real risk that serious harm to investors will be missed," Washington attorney Jason Zuckerman of Zuckerman Law said.
Written into the Dodd-Frank financial reform law of 2010, the whistleblower law was adopted to make sure tips about financial wrongdoing aren't ignored, as they were before Bernie Madoff's $64.8 billion Ponzi scheme unraveled.
At its heart, the SEC's whistleblower program is about money, both the amount recovered on behalf of defrauded investors and the amount awarded to those who helped to expose fraud. Since its 2010 inception, the program has recovered more than $6 billion and paid out nearly $2 billion to informants.
Last year it awarded nearly $600 million, although more than half came in just two awards. One was the $279 million to the tipster credited with uncovering a $1 billion fraud at the Swedish telecom LM Ericsson. Another $104 million was shared by "seven whistleblowers, including foreign nationals … for reporting misconduct at an entity's in three jurisdictions," the agency said in its annual report.
READ MORE:
"This is the most successful anti-corruption program ever established, and when the rules were developed in 2010-11, the way the program has grown was not anticipated," said whistleblower attorney Stephen Kohn of Kohn, Kohn & Colapinto. "So, there are numerous holes that need to be addressed by Congress and the agency's own rule-making."
Among them, Kohn said, are delays that can keep whistleblowers waiting years to be paid even after the SEC sanctions a company, the difficulty whistleblowers contend with when appealing an SEC decision, and the lack of information tipsters receive while their claims are processed.
Limited information
As the program grows, the amount of information the SEC shares with the public keeps shrinking. The agency told Bloomberg Law it doesn't track how many analysts who are not company insiders, such as short-sellers, received awards or how many awards went to claimants representing themselves. It also won't release the number of attorneys working in the whistleblower office. All of that information has been included in previous annual reports.
"OWB includes in the annual report the statistics that we believe are the most useful metrics for understanding trends in the Whistleblower Program," the agency said in response to written questions from Bloomberg Law. "We have modified which statistics we have included over time, and we anticipate revisiting which statistics to include in the future based on public feedback to our annual report."
The SEC also took the unprecedented step this year of not contesting a motion to seal an appeals court ruling critical of an SEC decision to award $14 million to Carson Block, the CEO of the short-seller Muddy Waters Capital. SEC staff found Block didn't qualify as a whistleblower under the agency's own criteria. And it denied a FOIA request from Bloomberg Law to identify the attorney who represented a client who was awarded $20 million, even after the agency found that "much of the information Claimant provided was already known to the Enforcement staff, and the new, helpful information Claimant provided was fairly limited."
A 2022 Bloomberg Law investigation found the SEC's emphasis on secrecy went far beyond its legal mandate to protect whistleblowers' identities, it often ignored its own rules when making decisions, and law firms employing three former SEC officials had been awarded more than $420 million on behalf of clients.
The SEC follows a two-step process when handling whistleblower tips. First, they are vetted by the enforcement division. If an action is successful, whistleblowers then submit paperwork to the Office of the Whistleblower, which decides whether they should be paid for their efforts, and how much. By law, claimants are entitled to between 10% and 30% of any money recovered.
That can take several years, and whistleblower attorneys have urged Congress to allocate more money to speed it up.
For now, Kohn and Zuckerman each said other measures are needed. First, Congress needs to make sure whistleblowers who expose large corporate fraud are rewarded if the company at the heart of the scandal goes bankrupt.
In March, the SEC approved awards for two whistleblowers who separately uncovered a $1 billion fraud by a Texas viatical company, Life Partners. John McPherson, an outside analyst and investor, and John Barr, a victim of the fraud, spent years helping the SEC investigate, prosecute and win multi-million-dollar judgments against the company.
But Life Partners declared bankruptcy soon after the SEC sanctions. Even though a bankruptcy court eventually returned about $1 billion to investors, the SEC said McPherson and Barr aren't entitled to any of that money.
READ MORE:
The men have asked the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit to overturn that decision, and the case is pending.
"If the fraud is so big that it sends a company into bankruptcy, that is telling you that these whistleblowers did a tremendous public service," Kohn said. "How can you decide not to pay whistleblowers when you recover hundreds of millions of dollars?"
The point of the whistleblower program, and any changes Congress may make, is not just to protect tipsters but to guard the stability of the U.S. financial markets, Zuckerman said. One easy remedy, he said, would be to allow SEC enforcement staff to provide more updates to whistleblowers, who can wait for years without knowing where the investigation stands.
"U.S. capital markets are the envy of the world because there is the assumption that there is rigorous enforcement of U.S. securities laws," Zuckerman said. "The whistleblower program has been tremendously successful, and I think the most important thing is to make sure it has the resources it needs to reward and protect people who put a lot on the line to come forward."
